Skip to main content

Underserved Areas for Broadband in Massachusetts (2026)

Millions of Americans still lack access to reliable, affordable broadband. In Massachusetts, the digital divide is most acute in smaller communities where provider investment has been limited. The table below highlights the least-populated cities in our database — areas where broadband options are most likely to be sparse.

30 Smallest Communities Tracked in Massachusetts

#CityPopulationCoverage Outlook
1Princeton3,412Likely underserved — limited provider options
2Williamstown3,515Likely underserved — limited provider options
3Osterville3,518Likely underserved — limited provider options
4Sagamore3,623Likely underserved — limited provider options
5South Dennis3,643Likely underserved — limited provider options
6Sunderland3,663Likely underserved — limited provider options
7Brimfield3,694Likely underserved — limited provider options
8Hopedale3,753Likely underserved — limited provider options
9Oak Bluffs3,778Likely underserved — limited provider options
10Rochester3,785Likely underserved — limited provider options
11Falmouth3,799Likely underserved — limited provider options
12Buzzards Bay3,859Likely underserved — limited provider options
13Wilbraham3,915Likely underserved — limited provider options
14East Sandwich3,940Likely underserved — limited provider options
15Hubbardston3,977Likely underserved — limited provider options
16Orange4,018Likely underserved — limited provider options
17Westborough4,045Likely underserved — limited provider options
18Assonet4,084Likely underserved — limited provider options
19Forestdale4,099Likely underserved — limited provider options
20Raynham Center4,100Likely underserved — limited provider options
21Winchendon4,213Likely underserved — limited provider options
22Bolton4,220Likely underserved — limited provider options
23Ipswich4,222Likely underserved — limited provider options
24Marshfield4,335Likely underserved — limited provider options
25Sherborn4,401Likely underserved — limited provider options
26Turners Falls4,470Likely underserved — limited provider options
27West Newbury4,500Likely underserved — limited provider options
28Avon4,521Likely underserved — limited provider options
29Southampton4,550Likely underserved — limited provider options
30Carlisle4,799Likely underserved — limited provider options

The Digital Divide in Massachusetts

Rural and low-income communities in Massachusetts often have only one or two broadband providers — and in some cases, none offering speeds that meet the FCC's 100/20 Mbps benchmark. This lack of competition leads to higher prices and slower speeds compared to urban areas.

Federal programs like BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment), the Affordable Connectivity Program successor, and USDA ReConnect grants are directing billions toward closing these gaps. You can check whether your area qualifies for subsidized broadband by entering your ZIP code in our availability checker.

How This Data Is Compiled

We track cities using U.S. Census population estimates and cross-reference them with FCC BDC filings. Smaller population centers are more likely to be underserved because providers prioritize areas with higher subscriber density. For our full methodology, see the methodology page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which areas in Massachusetts have the worst broadband coverage?
Smaller, more rural communities in Massachusetts tend to have the fewest broadband options. The table above lists the least-populated tracked cities, which often correlate with limited provider competition and slower available speeds.
What is being done about broadband gaps in Massachusetts?
The federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program is allocating billions to expand high-speed internet to underserved areas nationwide. Massachusetts is slated to receive funding to close coverage gaps in rural and low-income communities.
How can I report a broadband gap in Massachusetts?
You can file a challenge on the FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) map at broadbandmap.fcc.gov if your address is incorrectly listed as having service. This data directly influences federal funding allocations.