Skip to main content

Underserved Areas for Broadband in Minnesota (2026)

Millions of Americans still lack access to reliable, affordable broadband. In Minnesota, the digital divide is most acute in smaller communities where provider investment has been limited. The table below highlights the least-populated cities in our database — areas where broadband options are most likely to be sparse.

30 Smallest Communities Tracked in Minnesota

#CityPopulationCoverage Outlook
1Sleepy Eye3,452Likely underserved — limited provider options
2Mora3,462Likely underserved — limited provider options
3Newport3,480Likely underserved — limited provider options
4Eveleth3,493Likely underserved — limited provider options
5Collegeville3,516Likely underserved — limited provider options
6Melrose3,616Likely underserved — limited provider options
7Two Harbors3,633Likely underserved — limited provider options
8Long Prairie3,661Likely underserved — limited provider options
9Zumbrota3,726Likely underserved — limited provider options
10Saint Charles3,735Likely underserved — limited provider options
11Pine Island3,769Likely underserved — limited provider options
12Norwood Young America3,863Likely underserved — limited provider options
13Ely3,924Likely underserved — limited provider options
14Bayport4,024Likely underserved — limited provider options
15Scandia4,057Likely underserved — limited provider options
16Park Rapids4,142Likely underserved — limited provider options
17Cold Spring4,164Likely underserved — limited provider options
18Le Sueur4,213Likely underserved — limited provider options
19Pipestone4,215Likely underserved — limited provider options
20Cannon Falls4,220Likely underserved — limited provider options
21Watertown4,289Likely underserved — limited provider options
22Carver4,311Likely underserved — limited provider options
23Wadena4,325Likely underserved — limited provider options
24Rockford4,358Likely underserved — limited provider options
25Wayzata4,434Likely underserved — limited provider options
26Sauk Centre4,555Likely underserved — limited provider options
27Saint James4,605Likely underserved — limited provider options
28Dilworth4,612Likely underserved — limited provider options
29Princeton4,680Likely underserved — limited provider options
30Lonsdale4,686Likely underserved — limited provider options

The Digital Divide in Minnesota

Rural and low-income communities in Minnesota often have only one or two broadband providers — and in some cases, none offering speeds that meet the FCC's 100/20 Mbps benchmark. This lack of competition leads to higher prices and slower speeds compared to urban areas.

Federal programs like BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment), the Affordable Connectivity Program successor, and USDA ReConnect grants are directing billions toward closing these gaps. You can check whether your area qualifies for subsidized broadband by entering your ZIP code in our availability checker.

How This Data Is Compiled

We track cities using U.S. Census population estimates and cross-reference them with FCC BDC filings. Smaller population centers are more likely to be underserved because providers prioritize areas with higher subscriber density. For our full methodology, see the methodology page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which areas in Minnesota have the worst broadband coverage?
Smaller, more rural communities in Minnesota tend to have the fewest broadband options. The table above lists the least-populated tracked cities, which often correlate with limited provider competition and slower available speeds.
What is being done about broadband gaps in Minnesota?
The federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program is allocating billions to expand high-speed internet to underserved areas nationwide. Minnesota is slated to receive funding to close coverage gaps in rural and low-income communities.
How can I report a broadband gap in Minnesota?
You can file a challenge on the FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) map at broadbandmap.fcc.gov if your address is incorrectly listed as having service. This data directly influences federal funding allocations.