Skip to main content

Underserved Areas for Broadband in Wisconsin (2026)

Millions of Americans still lack access to reliable, affordable broadband. In Wisconsin, the digital divide is most acute in smaller communities where provider investment has been limited. The table below highlights the least-populated cities in our database — areas where broadband options are most likely to be sparse.

30 Smallest Communities Tracked in Wisconsin

#CityPopulationCoverage Outlook
1Peshtigo3,420Likely underserved — limited provider options
2Seymour3,440Likely underserved — limited provider options
3Merton3,441Likely underserved — limited provider options
4Lake Delton3,501Likely underserved — limited provider options
5Sauk City3,518Likely underserved — limited provider options
6Black River Falls3,523Likely underserved — limited provider options
7Pulaski3,550Likely underserved — limited provider options
8Stanley3,569Likely underserved — limited provider options
9Windsor3,573Likely underserved — limited provider options
10Combined Locks3,634Likely underserved — limited provider options
11Omro3,652Likely underserved — limited provider options
12Camp Lake3,665Likely underserved — limited provider options
13Bloomer3,683Likely underserved — limited provider options
14Pell Lake3,722Likely underserved — limited provider options
15Barron3,733Likely underserved — limited provider options
16Horicon3,767Likely underserved — limited provider options
17Lancaster3,778Likely underserved — limited provider options
18Rochester3,785Likely underserved — limited provider options
19Marshall3,787Likely underserved — limited provider options
20Kiel3,932Likely underserved — limited provider options
21Cross Plains4,000Likely underserved — limited provider options
22Chilton4,080Likely underserved — limited provider options
23Saukville4,258Likely underserved — limited provider options
24Baldwin4,291Likely underserved — limited provider options
25Kewaskum4,309Likely underserved — limited provider options
26Prescott4,333Likely underserved — limited provider options
27Medford4,338Likely underserved — limited provider options
28Mauston4,347Likely underserved — limited provider options
29Prairie du Sac4,420Likely underserved — limited provider options
30Mosinee4,452Likely underserved — limited provider options

The Digital Divide in Wisconsin

Rural and low-income communities in Wisconsin often have only one or two broadband providers — and in some cases, none offering speeds that meet the FCC's 100/20 Mbps benchmark. This lack of competition leads to higher prices and slower speeds compared to urban areas.

Federal programs like BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment), the Affordable Connectivity Program successor, and USDA ReConnect grants are directing billions toward closing these gaps. You can check whether your area qualifies for subsidized broadband by entering your ZIP code in our availability checker.

How This Data Is Compiled

We track cities using U.S. Census population estimates and cross-reference them with FCC BDC filings. Smaller population centers are more likely to be underserved because providers prioritize areas with higher subscriber density. For our full methodology, see the methodology page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which areas in Wisconsin have the worst broadband coverage?
Smaller, more rural communities in Wisconsin tend to have the fewest broadband options. The table above lists the least-populated tracked cities, which often correlate with limited provider competition and slower available speeds.
What is being done about broadband gaps in Wisconsin?
The federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program is allocating billions to expand high-speed internet to underserved areas nationwide. Wisconsin is slated to receive funding to close coverage gaps in rural and low-income communities.
How can I report a broadband gap in Wisconsin?
You can file a challenge on the FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) map at broadbandmap.fcc.gov if your address is incorrectly listed as having service. This data directly influences federal funding allocations.