Starlink vs Traditional Internet

What Makes Starlink Different

Starlink is a Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite internet constellation operated by SpaceX. Unlike traditional satellite internet from providers like HughesNet and Viasat that use geostationary satellites 22,000+ miles above Earth, Starlink satellites orbit at just 340 miles altitude. This dramatically lower orbit reduces latency from 600+ms to 25-60ms, making Starlink the first satellite internet service capable of supporting video calls and casual gaming.

As of early 2026, SpaceX has deployed over 6,000 Starlink satellites covering most of the continental US and many international markets. The system uses phased-array antennas ("Dishy") that electronically track satellites across the sky without any moving parts.

Starlink vs Traditional Internet Comparison

Where Starlink Excels

Starlink is truly transformative for rural and remote locations where the only previous options were legacy satellite (HughesNet/Viasat at 600+ms latency), slow DSL (1-10 Mbps), or cellular hotspots. For these addresses, Starlink's 50-200 Mbps with usable latency represents an order-of-magnitude improvement in internet quality.

Starlink also works for RVs, boats, and remote worksites through its Roam plan, offering internet access in locations where no terrestrial infrastructure exists. This mobility is unique among broadband options.

For a detailed guide to all rural internet options, see our best internet for rural areas guide.

Where Traditional Internet Wins

In urban and suburban areas with fiber or cable availability, traditional broadband is superior in virtually every metric. AT&T Fiber delivers 300-5,000 Mbps at $55-180/month with no data caps, no upfront equipment cost, and 5-15ms latency. That is 2-25 times faster than Starlink at half the price and a quarter of the latency.

Xfinity cable offers 200-2,000 Mbps at $35-80/month with lower latency and far more consistent speeds than Starlink. Even Spectrum's base 300 Mbps plan at $49.99/month outperforms Starlink's typical speeds at less than half the monthly cost and no $499 equipment purchase.

Starlink Limitations to Know

Cost: At $120/month plus a $499 upfront hardware cost, Starlink is the most expensive residential internet option. The total first-year cost is $1,939, compared to $600-720 for a typical cable or fiber plan.

Speed variability: Starlink speeds fluctuate more than wired connections. You might get 180 Mbps one hour and 50 Mbps the next, depending on satellite positions, weather, and the number of subscribers in your cell. Evening peak hours (7-10 PM) tend to deliver the slowest speeds.

Weather sensitivity: Heavy rain, snow accumulation on the dish, and dense cloud cover can temporarily reduce speeds or cause brief outages. The dish has a built-in snow melt feature, but heavy wet snow can still cause issues.

Obstructions: Trees, buildings, and other obstructions between your dish and the sky cause connection dropouts. Starlink requires a clear view of the sky, ideally with less than 1% obstruction. The Starlink app can scan your sky for obstructions before you commit to the service.

Making the Right Choice

The decision framework is straightforward. If fiber or cable delivering 100+ Mbps is available at your address, choose that. The lower cost, higher speeds, and better reliability make traditional broadband the clear winner in areas with modern infrastructure. If your only wired options are slow DSL (under 25 Mbps) or legacy satellite, Starlink is worth the premium.

Check what traditional broadband is available at your address before ordering Starlink. You might have options you are not aware of, as fiber networks have expanded rapidly in 2024-2026.

Check all internet options at your address:

1-888-788-6413

Starlink in 2026: Current Performance and Limitations

Starlink has matured significantly since its beta period, but understanding its current capabilities and limitations is essential for making an informed decision versus traditional internet options.

Speed and capacity evolution: Starlink's standard residential service delivers 50-200 Mbps download and 10-25 Mbps upload in most locations as of early 2026. When the service first launched, speeds often exceeded 200 Mbps due to fewer subscribers per satellite beam. As adoption has grown, per-user speeds have normalized to the 50-150 Mbps range during peak hours in most areas. SpaceX continues launching satellites to expand capacity, and second-generation V2 Mini satellites provide roughly 4 times the capacity of first-generation satellites, which should improve speeds as the constellation transitions.

Reliability improvements: Early Starlink users experienced frequent brief outages of 5-30 seconds as their dish transitioned between satellites. Modern firmware and the denser constellation have reduced these micro-outages significantly. Most users now experience 99.5-99.8% uptime, compared to 99.9%+ for cable and fiber. The remaining 0.2-0.5% downtime occurs primarily during severe weather, firmware updates, and satellite constellation transitions. For general browsing and streaming, these brief drops are barely noticeable. For video calls, they cause occasional 2-3 second freezes that may be disruptive.

The $599 hardware investment: Starlink requires a $599 upfront equipment purchase (or $120/month hardware lease). The equipment includes a phased-array antenna dish, mounting hardware, router, and cable. Installation is self-service, and the dish includes motors that automatically orient toward optimal satellite positions. This upfront cost is the most significant barrier and means Starlink requires a commitment of at least 6-12 months for the economics to make sense compared to traditional providers with no or low equipment costs.

When Traditional Internet Beats Starlink

Despite Starlink's innovations, traditional wired and cellular internet outperforms satellite in several important categories. Understanding these differences prevents disappointment if you switch to Starlink from a situation where traditional internet was actually the better choice.

Latency-sensitive applications: Starlink's 25-50ms latency is a dramatic improvement over traditional satellite (600+ ms) but still significantly higher than cable (15-30ms) and fiber (5-15ms). For competitive online gaming, real-time trading, and latency-sensitive professional applications, this difference is meaningful. If you have access to cable or fiber at your address, Starlink is not the better choice for these activities. See our latency and ping guide for a detailed explanation of how latency affects different applications.

Heavy upload requirements: Starlink's 10-25 Mbps upload speed is adequate for video calls and basic file sharing but insufficient for professional content creation, large dataset uploads, or serving as a business server. Cable internet typically matches this upload range, while fiber provides 100-1000+ Mbps symmetrical upload. If your work involves regularly uploading large files, traditional fiber or even cable provides a better experience.

Cost for available alternatives: At $120/month for the service plus $599 equipment, Starlink's total first-year cost is approximately $2,039. Cable internet at $50/month with a $100 self-install costs $700 for the same year. Fiber at $55/month costs $660. T-Mobile 5G at $50/month costs $600. Starlink's economics only make sense when these alternatives are unavailable at your address, which is precisely the market it was designed to serve. For rural areas without traditional broadband, see our rural internet guide.