Skip to main content
InternetProviders.aiAI-Powered Internet Advisor

Quick Answer

Best for most users: Viasat typically offers better value with Satellite technology, while Starlink provides Low-Earth Orbit Satellite-based service. If you have access to both providers, Viasat usually delivers superior performance and value.

Bottom line: Choose Viasat for the best combination of speed, reliability, and price. Consider Starlink only if Viasat is not available in your area or if you have specific needs that Starlink addresses better.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Viasat Starlink
Technology Satellite Low-Earth Orbit Satellite
Max Speed 150 Mbps 220 Mbps
Starting Price $70/mo $120/mo
Contract Required Yes No
Data Cap Varies by plan (40-300 GB) No data caps
Best For Rural areas with no other options Rural areas with no other options

Viasat: The Satellite Option

Viasat, founded in 1986 and headquartered in Carlsbad, CA, has established itself as a premier satellite internet provider serving customers across all 50 states.

Key Advantages

  • Faster than HughesNet
  • Available nationwide
  • Higher data allowances
  • Reliable satellite coverage

Notable Limitations

  • High latency (500-700ms)
  • Expensive plans
  • Contracts required
  • Data caps on all plans

Call now to order: 1-855-463-9333

Starlink: The Satellite Option

Starlink is SpaceX's revolutionary low-Earth orbit satellite constellation, delivering low-latency internet to even the most remote locations worldwide.

Key Advantages

  • Much lower latency than traditional satellite (20-40ms)
  • No data caps
  • No contracts
  • Truly global coverage

Notable Limitations

  • $120/mo + $599 equipment
  • Obstructions can affect service
  • Higher cost than terrestrial options
  • Still in expansion

Order online at: starlink.com

Speed & Performance Comparison

The speed differences between Viasat and Starlink reflect their fundamental technology differences. Viasat operates using Satellite delivering up to 150 Mbps, while Starlink utilizes Low-Earth Orbit Satellite offering speeds up to 220 Mbps.

Satellite internet requires signals to travel approximately 22,000 miles to geostationary orbit and back, introducing inherent latency typically ranging from 500-800 milliseconds. This high latency affects real-time applications like gaming, video calls, and VoIP services.

Real-world performance testing shows significant differences in daily usage. Cable internet provides asymmetrical speeds with faster downloads than uploads, which works well for streaming and web browsing but can limit upload-heavy activities.

For households with multiple users, simultaneous device support varies considerably. Higher-speed connections handle more concurrent streams, video calls, and downloads without performance degradation. Cable and DSL connections may experience slowdowns with 5+ active devices, especially during peak evening hours.

Latency considerations become crucial for specific use cases. Online gaming requires latency under 100ms for competitive play. Video conferencing works best under 150ms to avoid awkward delays. Satellite internet exceeds these thresholds significantly, making real-time applications challenging.

Pricing & Value Analysis

Viasat's pricing starts at $70/mo, while Starlink begins at $120/mo. However, total cost analysis requires examining installation fees, equipment charges, contract requirements, and promotional pricing structures.

Installation costs vary significantly between providers. Satellite installation typically costs $100-300 and requires professional dish placement with clear sky views.

Equipment fees represent another cost consideration. Satellite providers typically charge $10-15/month for modem/router equipment or require $300+ upfront purchase.

Data cap economics significantly impact total cost for streaming households. Viasat implements Varies by plan (40-300 GB), while Starlink has No data caps. Families streaming 4K video, gaming online, and working from home can easily consume 500+ GB monthly. Exceeding data caps triggers either throttling or overage charges of $10-25 per 50 GB.

Contract requirements affect long-term value. Viasat requires contracts, while Starlink offers no-contract service. Early termination fees can reach $300-400, effectively locking customers into service even when better alternatives become available.

Promotional pricing creates additional complexity. Many providers advertise attractive first-year rates that increase 20-40% after 12 months. Reading the fine print reveals true long-term costs. Calculating total two-year cost including installation, equipment, and post-promotional pricing provides more accurate value comparison than advertised monthly rates.

Coverage & Availability Analysis

Geographic availability represents the most fundamental comparison factor. Satellite technology provides nationwide coverage, reaching any location with clear sky views including rural areas, RV parks, and remote properties.

Viasat serves all 50 states through satellite technology. Starlink provides nationwide satellite coverage. This coverage gap often eliminates the need for comparison - customers simply choose whichever provider serves their address.

Rural availability presents the clearest distinction. Satellite internet fills the rural broadband gap, serving locations where cable and fiber infrastructure doesn't reach economically.

Service expansion plans affect future availability. Cable providers face competition from fiber expansion and 5G home internet alternatives. Satellite providers maintain consistent nationwide coverage as new markets don't require additional infrastructure.

Address-specific availability checking remains essential. Provider coverage maps show general service areas but do not guarantee availability at every address within those zones. Calling providers directly with your exact address or using online availability checkers provides accurate information about which services you can actually order.

Contract Terms & Flexibility

Viasat requires 24-month contracts on most plans, while Starlink offers no-contract service. This fundamental difference affects customer flexibility and long-term commitment obligations.

Early termination fees represent significant financial penalties. Contract-based providers typically charge $300-400 for early cancellation, prorated by remaining contract months.

Contract flexibility becomes especially important given rapid broadband infrastructure changes. Fiber providers are extending networks into previously underserved areas. 5G home internet is emerging as viable alternative. Customers locked into contracts miss opportunities to switch when superior options arrive without paying substantial termination fees.

Service quality protections differ between contract and no-contract plans. Contract terms may include service level guarantees and pricing locks, protecting customers from mid-contract rate increases.

Relocation considerations affect contract value. Customers who move during contract terms must either transfer service to new address (if available) or pay early termination fees. Military personnel and frequent movers particularly benefit from contract-free options.

Technology Deep Dive: Understanding the Differences

The underlying technology fundamentally determines internet performance characteristics. Viasat uses Satellite while Starlink operates with Low-Earth Orbit Satellite. These technological foundations create distinct advantages and limitations.

Satellite internet beams signals from ground stations to satellites in geostationary orbit 22,300 miles above Earth, then down to customer dish equipment. This round-trip journey introduces 500-800ms latency - the time between requesting data and receiving response. Traditional ground-based internet travels through fiber-optic or copper cables with latency under 50ms.

Cable internet uses the same coaxial infrastructure as cable TV, sharing bandwidth among neighborhood users. During peak evening hours when many customers stream simultaneously, individual speeds may decrease. However, modern DOCSIS 3.1 cable technology still delivers gigabit speeds to most users.

Weather sensitivity differs dramatically by technology. Satellite internet experiences "rain fade" during heavy precipitation, snow, or dense clouds. Signal degradation or complete outages can occur during severe storms. Ground-based connections remain largely unaffected by weather conditions.

Network congestion patterns vary by technology type. Satellite providers manage finite bandwidth across many users, potentially throttling speeds during peak hours. Some satellite plans offer "bonus zone" data during overnight hours (2-8am) when fewer customers are online.

Customer Service & Support Comparison

Customer service quality significantly impacts the ownership experience beyond technical specifications. Support channel availability, response times, technician expertise, and issue resolution processes vary considerably between providers.

Both Viasat and Starlink offer phone support, though hours of operation and wait times differ. Major national providers typically offer 24/7 phone support but may route calls to overseas call centers with longer hold times.

Online support resources include troubleshooting guides, video tutorials, community forums, and mobile apps for account management. Self-service options help customers resolve common issues like equipment reboots, bill payments, and plan changes without calling support. Live chat support increasingly supplements phone channels for customers preferring text-based assistance.

Technical support quality matters most during service disruptions. Satellite installation and repairs require specialized technicians with equipment alignment expertise. Weather-related outages may need dish realignment or obstruction removal.

Customer satisfaction ratings from J.D. Power, Consumer Reports, and BBB ratings provide comparative insights. Reading recent customer reviews on Reddit, DSLReports, and local forums reveals current service quality trends. Pay attention to comments about billing issues, service reliability, and support responsiveness in your specific market.

Local Market Considerations

The competitive dynamics between Viasat and Starlink vary dramatically by location. Rural markets often have limited options, with satellite serving as primary or backup internet source.

Markets dominated by single cable or satellite provider may see higher prices and less responsive customer service due to limited competition.

State-level regulations affect pricing, contract terms, and consumer protections. Some states mandate minimum broadband speeds, prohibit data caps, or require transparent pricing disclosure. Local franchise agreements between providers and municipalities influence service quality, expansion commitments, and customer support requirements.

Before committing to either provider, research your local market conditions. Check provider coverage maps for your exact address. Read recent customer reviews from your city or region. Contact both providers for current pricing and promotional offers. Ask neighbors about their experiences with reliability, speeds, and customer service.

Consider future infrastructure developments in your area. Contact your city's broadband coordinator or economic development office about planned fiber expansions, 5G deployments, or new provider entries. Choosing shorter contract terms or no-contract service provides flexibility to switch when better options arrive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, Viasat or Starlink?

Starlink offers faster maximum speeds with up to 220 Mbps compared to 150 Mbps. However, satellite latency affects real-time performance significantly despite competitive download speeds.

Is Viasat or Starlink better for gaming?

Satellite internet is generally unsuitable for competitive online gaming due to 500-800ms latency. Most online games require latency under 100ms for acceptable performance. Choose the ground-based provider for gaming.

Which provider has better availability?

Satellite providers offer nationwide coverage reaching any location with clear sky views, making them available in all 50 states including remote rural areas. Ground-based providers serve specific markets with limited geographic footprint.

Do these providers have data caps?

Viasat implements Varies by plan (40-300 GB), while Starlink has No data caps. Data caps significantly impact streaming households - a family watching 4K video and gaming online can easily exceed 500 GB monthly. Exceeding satellite data caps triggers speed throttling to 1-3 Mbps until next billing cycle.

Which is more expensive?

Viasat starts at $70/mo while Starlink begins at $120/mo. However, total cost analysis must include installation fees, equipment charges, contract requirements, and data overage potential. Satellite internet typically costs more per megabit but may be the only option in rural areas.

Can I use these providers for video conferencing?

Video conferencing works on satellite internet but with noticeable delays due to 500-800ms latency. Expect awkward pauses in conversations and slight audio-video sync issues. For occasional personal video calls it works adequately, but professionals conducting frequent meetings will find ground-based connections much better.

Which provider should I choose?

Choose ground-based internet if available at your address - check both providers for coverage and pricing. Choose satellite only if ground-based options are unavailable, as satellite provides slower speeds with higher latency at higher cost. However, satellite internet is far better than no internet or dial-up in rural areas without other options.

Disclosure

InternetProviders.ai is an independent review site. We may earn affiliate commissions when you order service through phone numbers or links on this page. These commissions help us maintain our free resources but never influence our editorial content or recommendations. All prices, speeds, and service details were verified at time of publication but may change. Call the providers directly to confirm current offers in your area.

InternetProviders.ai Editorial Team

About the Author

Written by the InternetProviders.ai research team with expertise in broadband technologies, satellite internet, fiber-optic networks, and ISP comparison analysis. Our team tests and reviews internet services nationwide to provide unbiased guidance for consumers navigating provider choices.

Last updated: February 10, 2026