Skip to main content

Underserved Areas for Broadband in Indiana (2026)

Millions of Americans still lack access to reliable, affordable broadband. In Indiana, the digital divide is most acute in smaller communities where provider investment has been limited. The table below highlights the least-populated cities in our database — areas where broadband options are most likely to be sparse.

30 Smallest Communities Tracked in Indiana

#CityPopulationCoverage Outlook
1Hanover3,543Likely underserved — limited provider options
2Country Squire Lakes3,571Likely underserved — limited provider options
3Aurora3,701Likely underserved — limited provider options
4Hebron3,704Likely underserved — limited provider options
5Upland3,785Likely underserved — limited provider options
6Roselawn4,131Likely underserved — limited provider options
7Sullivan4,155Likely underserved — limited provider options
8DeMotte4,168Likely underserved — limited provider options
9Berne4,173Likely underserved — limited provider options
10Pendleton4,219Likely underserved — limited provider options
11Mitchell4,252Likely underserved — limited provider options
12Edinburgh4,435Likely underserved — limited provider options
13Bremen4,565Likely underserved — limited provider options
14Ligonier4,568Likely underserved — limited provider options
15Whiteland4,599Likely underserved — limited provider options
16Georgetown4,705Likely underserved — limited provider options
17Fortville4,784Likely underserved — limited provider options
18Clinton4,811Likely underserved — limited provider options
19Whiting4,872Likely underserved — limited provider options
20Lawrenceburg4,960Likely underserved — limited provider options
21Alexandria5,047Likely underserved — limited provider options
22Winona Lake5,053Likely underserved — limited provider options
23Tipton5,144Likely underserved — limited provider options
24North Manchester5,277Likely underserved — limited provider options
25Cicero5,301Likely underserved — limited provider options
26Monticello5,322Likely underserved — limited provider options
27Huntertown5,387Likely underserved — limited provider options
28Westville5,662Likely underserved — limited provider options
29McCordsville5,773Likely underserved — limited provider options
30Rensselaer5,927Likely underserved — limited provider options

The Digital Divide in Indiana

Rural and low-income communities in Indiana often have only one or two broadband providers — and in some cases, none offering speeds that meet the FCC's 100/20 Mbps benchmark. This lack of competition leads to higher prices and slower speeds compared to urban areas.

Federal programs like BEAD (Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment), the Affordable Connectivity Program successor, and USDA ReConnect grants are directing billions toward closing these gaps. You can check whether your area qualifies for subsidized broadband by entering your ZIP code in our availability checker.

How This Data Is Compiled

We track cities using U.S. Census population estimates and cross-reference them with FCC BDC filings. Smaller population centers are more likely to be underserved because providers prioritize areas with higher subscriber density. For our full methodology, see the methodology page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which areas in Indiana have the worst broadband coverage?
Smaller, more rural communities in Indiana tend to have the fewest broadband options. The table above lists the least-populated tracked cities, which often correlate with limited provider competition and slower available speeds.
What is being done about broadband gaps in Indiana?
The federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program is allocating billions to expand high-speed internet to underserved areas nationwide. Indiana is slated to receive funding to close coverage gaps in rural and low-income communities.
How can I report a broadband gap in Indiana?
You can file a challenge on the FCC Broadband Data Collection (BDC) map at broadbandmap.fcc.gov if your address is incorrectly listed as having service. This data directly influences federal funding allocations.